The Presidential Election Petition Tribunal (PEPT) has reserved rulings in applications by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), President-elect, Bola Ahmed Tinubu and the All Progressives Congress (APC) seeking the dismissal of the petition by Atiku Abubakar and the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP).
After taking arguments from lawyers to the parties, Justice Haruna Tsammani-led five-member Tribunal on Friday announced that the rulings have been reserved to be delivered on the day of judgment in the main petition.
Lawyers who moved the applications for INEC, Tinubu and APC,
Kemi Pinheiro, Yusuf Ali and Lateef Fagbemi (all Senior Advocates of Nigeria)
prayed to the court to grant the reliefs in their applications, seven in all.
Lawyer to the petitioners, Chris Uche (SAN) in counter-argument urged the court to dismiss all the applications and proceed to hear
his clients on merit.
The court has adjourned further pre-hearing sessions in the
petition till Saturday for the parties to agree on the schedule to be adopted for
the hearing of the petition.
The INEC, Tinubu and the APC had kicked against the request
of former Vice President, Atiku for a live telecast of his petition challenging
the declaration of the President-elect as the winner of the 2023 presidential
election.
In their separate objections at the Tribunal on Wednesday,
the trio insisted granting the request would jeopardise the solemnity of the
court.
Tinubu in vehement objections raised on his behalf by Chief
Wole Olanipekun (SAN) said Atiku’s request was not only surprising but also
dangerous as it could prejudice the court.
Olanipekun said Atiku should not be allowed to turn the
court into a football stadium or crusade, theatre or film grounds where all manner
of telecasts is permitted.
He said the court should not grant an order that cannot be
enforced or supervised. He warned that the request, if granted, could expose
judicial officers to avoidable dangers, and demanded that heavy cost be imposed
on Atiku for making the request.
Fagbemi who opposed on behalf of the APC said facilities and
policy documents were not available for the application to be granted.
He said Atiku had failed to disclose injuries he would
suffer if the request was not granted.
The electoral body in objection by its counsel, Abubakar
Balarabe Mahmoud (SAN) said the court is for serious business and not a marketplace
where anything goes.
He had also maintained that the request was unnecessary and
uncalled for and should not be granted.
0 Comments
Your comment is your opinion about the post, and no one will owe you accountable, so do it justly. Thanks.